ADR Resources - Ethics

Opinion of the Alabama Supreme Court Commission on Dispute Resolution

OPINION 001-2021
Opinion of the Alabama Supreme Court Commission on Dispute Resolution

The Commission considered your request for an opinion on September 3, 2021.

Request:  A group of registered mediators is contemplating forming a mediation center and pose this question:  Is it proper for our mediation center (made up of registered mediators) to offer a rewards program for lawyers who use their services?  Lawyers would earn points for using our center to mediate and for referring other lawyers to use our center.  Points would be redeemable for gift cards and the more points the higher the value of the gift cards.  Points, if saved, could eventually be redeemed for a 3 day stay at a hotel, for example.”

Response:  No.  A mediation center that offers money, gift cards, financial incentives or other like rewards to a lawyer and/or lawyers using the mediation center harms the profession by giving the appearance of bias, prejudice and partiality towards the lawyer/law firm using the mediation center’s services.  It could give the appearance of preferential treatment. Here, the lawyer is receiving a benefit in exchange for paying the mediator (e.g., earning points which may be redeemed for gift cards, etc.).  A party upon learning that the lawyer and/or law firm is receiving something for hiring the mediator might expect that they will receive favorable treatment. It impairs the mediator’s ability to be impartial and unbiased.



Code of Ethics for Mediators:

Standard 5. Impartiality and Conflicts of Interest

(a)  A mediator shall be impartial and shall advise all parties of any circumstances that may result in possible bias, prejudice, or impartiality on the part of the mediator.  Impartiality means freedom from favoritism or bias in work, action and appearance.

(b)  Required disclosures.

(1) A mediator must disclose to the disputing parties the following:

(B)  Any pecuniary interest the mediator may have in common with any of the parties or that may be affected by the outcome of the mediation process.

(D)  Any close personal relationship or other circumstances in addition to those specifically mentioned in this Standard, that might reasonably raise a question as to the mediator’s impartiality.

(3)  Prior service as a mediator in a mediation involving a party or an attorney for a party does not constitute representation of the party or consultation work for the party. However, mediators are strongly encouraged to disclose such prior relationshipsMediator must disclose any ongoing relationship with a party or an attorney for a party involved in a mediation, including membership on a panel of persons providing mediation, arbitration, or other alternative dispute resolution services to that party or attorney.

Standard 8.  Fees and Expenses

(c)  Referrals.  No commissions, rebates, or similar remuneration shall be given to or received by a mediator for referral of persons for mediation or related services.
The key words here “given to or received by a mediator.”  This standard does not say “given by a mediator.”

Standard 1. General

Under Standard 1 the offering of rewards and/or incentives to those who use the mediator’s services jeopardizes the mediator’s integrity and impartiality.

Standard 1 (a) Integrity, Impartiality and Professional Competence

(1) A mediator shall not accept any engagement, perform any service or undertake any act that would compromise the mediator’s integrity.

The standard says “would” not could or did.  As noted in Standard 8, “a mediator occupies a position of trust with respect to the parties and the court system.”

Emphasis added.

More Ethics Opinions
Read more about the Alabama Supreme Court Commission on Dispute Resolution.

Ethics Links
Alabama Supreme Court
Commission on Dispute Resolution
  - Opinion 001-21
  - Opinion 001-13
  - Opinion 001-10
  - Opinion 001-05

Mediator Code of Ethics

Arbitrator Code of Ethics

Consumer Complaints Against
Mediators and Arbitrators
For Ethical Violations



ADR Legislation Home

Select Cases

Alabama Law

Alabama Ethics Opinions of the Alabama Supreme Court Commission on Dispute Resolution

Alabama AG Opinion

Alabama Executive Orders

  • Executive Order 7, Expansion of the Workplace Mediation Pilot Program, March 20, 2003
  • Executive Order 50, State Agency ADR Task Force Appointed: Executive Order 50, September 16, 1998
  • Executive Order 42, Alabama Government Agencies Encouraged to Use Mediation, March 18, 1998


Private Judges

The Alabama Private Judge Act authorized the appointment of former or retired judges to serve as private judges in certain district and circuit court cases. - More -


Arbitration agreements, are often found in pre-printed consumer contracts. They require parties to the contract to resolve disputes in binding arbitration, rather than in court before a judge and/or jury. - More -


Mediation is a confidential, informal process during which an impartial third party, the mediator, assists disputing parties in reaching a mutually acceptable agreement regarding their dispute.

  • General Mediation offers a path to resolving many disputes. - More -
  • Family Mediation offers divorce and family mediation for parenting, divorce and post-divorce issues. - More -
  • Forclosure Prevention and Mortgage Modification Mediation offers specially-trained mediators to assist Alabama citizens with foreclosure and mortgage problems by mediating between the homeowner and the mortgage holder. - More -

Keeping your Information Safe

https:// is http secure.In keeping with industry standards, we have implemented a Secure Certificate on our website. You may see a lock symbol, a green color or the https:// protocol in the address bar. These indicate that you are accessing the real ACDR website and that the website encrypts transmitted data for additional protection.


Due to a high volume of spam, if you receive any communication from an entity purporting to be or representing the Alabama Center for Dispute Resolution, please verify by contacting the Alabama Center for Dispute Resolution at (334) 356-3802.

Identity thieves continually develop new ways to try to find out your personal information. Some common tip-offs that an email is phony are typos, grammatical mistakes, awkward language, missing words, extra spaces, and other signs that the email was written unprofessionally. Such emails might also ask you to look at an attachment or click a link and then give your personal information on a Web page or in a form. Or the sender’s email address might look suspicious. However, attackers are getting better at creating phony emails that look legitimate, so if you feel at all uncomfortable about an email that claims to be from the Center contact us.




Alabama CDR is the state office of dispute resolution. At the Center, we work with the courts, the Alabama State Bar, state agencies, schools, community mediation initiatives, and businesses to promote early and peaceful resolution of disputes. We are the administrative arm of the Alabama Supreme Court Commission on Dispute Resolution.


Alabama Center for Dispute Resolution
(334) 356-3802